Showing posts with label William Hendriksen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label William Hendriksen. Show all posts

Saturday, 24 January 2015

Gowan Books Again

 I went this morning to see my old friend John Gowan and got a few books, new and second hand.

The only new purchase was  Reformation Heritage Study Bible edited by Joel Beeke and Mike Barrett. I haven't even removed the wrapping from it as I type. Looking forward to doing that tonight when I have a chance to relax. 

I also  picked up a h/b copy of the New Geneva (NKJV) Study Bible edited by RC Sproul. I already had this in a superior leather edition (ESV) which I traded in against this and the RH Study Bible mentioned above. The footnotes in these Bibles will be the standard Reformed ones, along with helpful articles on various topics.

Looking forward to using these Bibles in future sermon preparation and indeed in ordinary reading of the Bible for personal devotions.

I picked up a h/b copy of William Hendriksen on Galatians. (Banner of Truth) I have all of WH's commentaries now with the sole exception of Matthew's Gospel. He is very balanced and helpful.

Another good purchase was a h/b copy of The Old Evangelicalism subtitled Old Truths for a New  Awakening by Iain Murray. Again, BOT, this is a very helpful book by a current master author. It deals with the doctrines of the old time preachers. Mostly Calvinist, yet he takes in AW Tozer and also General Booth. The emphasis is on the great Christian doctrines and not the modern substitute that flies under the #oldpaths flag of supposed dress standards or music etc. I certainly believe these other things have their place, but they are fast becoming in some circles the be all and end all of what is supposed to be "old time religion" but really a modern wannabe.

Three Views on ther Millenium and Beyond  (Zondervan) by Craig A Balising and others (p/b) s one of the those classic examples of Christians with differing viewpoints getting the chance of stating their own position and critiquing each others. As stated before, I have A-Mill views but I am always willing to take on board other view points for consideration. I am certainly not closed minded. The ministers in the FPC (Ulster) would divide down Pre-Mill (but defintely non Dispensational) and A-Mill lines with a smaller number of Post Mills in the ranks. I must admit that I don't envy those folks sitting in churches where there is one strict interpretation (usually Dispensationalism) allowed and none other. IMO, the fundamental doctrine on which there can be no compromise is the literal and physical return of Christ. Outside that, the jury is still out on many of the details. Each to their own, I suppose.

In the last couple of years, I have become more acquainted with the writings of J.I. Packer. I find them helpful. I try to divorce myself from his Anglican Churchman antics and just appreciate the solid doctrinal stuff which he manages to serve up so well in his books. I got Vol. 4 of his Collected Shorter Writings (Paternoster Press) which includes articles on Calvin, Luther and various theological subjects.This book is in h/b.

Last but not least, I got the small p/b book by Joel Beeke entitled: How to evaluate sermons (Evangelical Press) which does what it says it does on the tin. 

If within travelling distance, I encourage you to visit John Gowans bookshop and/or visit his website. You can also follow him on Twitter.  He has over 20,000 books in stock.

Monday, 22 December 2014

Hendriksen on Revelation

I am not yet at the stage where it may be said that I have A-Millennial convictions. More A-Mill views. If when the Lord comes, I am wrong then I will quite happily fall into with that which He has deemed best. I think every serious Bible student must confess that. For example, should it be the will of God that those of blood washed church (still on earth at that time) should go through the Tribulation prophesied in Matthew 24:29-30 (as I believe they will) then there will not be much that the Pre Trib men, charts and all, can do about it. I suggest that they arm themselves with the same verses that I often think about  e.g. that even all these things will be work together for our good. I develope these thoughts a bit more at length here

I bought William Hendriksen's More Than Conquerors abut 20 years ago. I have read it completely through twice in that time, and I am about to start it again over the Christmas period. (We have been reading the Book of Revelation together in our family devotions.) Without necessarily endorsing each and every interpretation, I think Hendriksen gives us a most sober look at this book that draws the written word of God to a conclusion. Hendriksen's commentary is (IMO) well thought out and well written. The introduction was especially encouraging as he set forth the hermeneutic that he would be employing. It is as follows: 

PROPOSITION 1: The book of Revelation consists of seven sections. They are parallel and each spans the entire new dispensation, from the first to the second coming of Christ.

a) Christ among the candlesticks/lampstands (1:1-3:22)
b) Vision of Heaven and the seals (4:1-7:17)
c) The seven trumpets (8:1-11:19)
d) The persecuting Dragon (12:1-14:20) 
e) The seven Bowls (15:1-16:21)
f) The fall of babylon (17:1-19:21)
g) The Final Consummation (20:1-22:21) 

PROPOSITION 2: The Book maybe divided into two major divisions:

a) Chs 1-11 Indwelt Church persecuted by world but is avenged, protected and victorious.
b) Ch 12-22 reveals spiritual background to struggle. Conflict between Christ and Satan where Christ, and therefore,  the Church is victorious.

PROPOSITION 3: The book is one. The principles of human conduct and divine moral government are progressively revealed; the lampstands give rise to the seals, the seals to the trumpets, etc. 

PROPOSITION 4: The seven sections are arranged in ascending, climatic order with progress in eschatological emphasis. The final judgement is first announced, then introduced and finally described. Similarly, the new Heaven and Earth are described more fully in final section then those which precede it.

PROPOSITION 5: The fabric of the book consists of moving pictures. The details that pertain to the picture should be interpreted in harmony with its central thought. We should ask two questions: 

a) What is the entire picture?
b) What is the predominant idea?

PROPOSITION 6: The seals, trumpets, vials and similar symbols do not refer to specific or  historical events or details of history, but to principles of human conduct and divine moral government which are operating throughout the world, especially throughout the new dispensation.


PROPOSITION 7: The Book is rooted in contemporaneous events and circumstances. Its symbols should be interpreted in the light of conditions which prevailed when the book was written.  


PROPOSITION 8: The Apocalypse is rooted in the sacred Scriptures. It should be interpreted in harmony with the teachings of the entire Bible.


PROPOSITION 9: The Apocalypse is rooted in the mind and revelation of God. God in Christ is the real Author, and this book contains the purpose of God concerning the history of the church.

I have most of Hendriksen's other commentaries which I find useful in sermon preparation. You can read more about him here.